>
Patriots Planet - New England Patriots Forums and Message Boards

Home Members List Top Posters Arcade Casino Toolbar
Go Back   Patriots Planet - New England Patriots Forums and Message Boards > The Razor > The Archives
Mark Forums Read rel="nofollow">Mark Forums Read
Register All Albums FAQDonate Calendar

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2007, 07:03 AM   #1
harrisonhits
NFL Can GFY
 
harrisonhits's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,810
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $751
My Mood


harrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the roughharrisonhits is a jewel in the rough
OT NFL Censors Houston Chronicle ?

link

Page linked to has video.

Missing NFL Blog Post: Self-Censorship or Something Else?
Posted Jun 10th 2007 7:30PM by Stephanie Stradley
Filed under: Texans, NFL Video, NFL Media Watch

On Friday, the front page of the Houston Chronicle promoted a blog video by NFL columnist John McClain criticizing the new rules on non-NFL sources using off-season video. The video made fun of the 45 second time limit restriction using mini-interviews with different members of the Texans organization, including Texans owner Bob McNair. By the afternoon, the post and the video were off the Chronicle website, though you can still find the original if you have the original links. The above UnCut Video is a copy of it that made it out onto the internets.

So, why did a video with an NFL owner in it get mysteriously pulled off a major newspaper's website? Did they remove the video because the NFL or Texans asked? Or was it removed because they feared what might happen from the NFL, that they would have to remove all videos from their website? Or maybe they figured they could change the policy easier by doing it quietly instead of a video that demonstrates how backwards the NFL is in dealing with non-traditional media. Or maybe they pulled it on purpose to have folks like us pay more attention to it. Hmmm.

The NFL in recent years has been trying to put more video on their own website and team websites. I'm all for that development, but at the same time to try to dramatically restrict non-NFL video on their product in my mind seems short-sided and anti-fan. If the NFL provides good video and commentary, people will go to their websites--they don't need to try to create an unnecessary content monopoly. Devoted fans of a team can't ever find enough information on their favorite team, especially in the off-season.

It's too bad that the blog post was taken off the site. This is an issue that needs to be championed for the fan's benefit. As John McClain wrote in the comments before the blog post was pulled:
"This all started last year when the league began to restrict how many local television cameramen could cover games. It's about video, not print. It's a brave new world when it comes to New Media. We -- the media and the NFL -- are still trying to find a common ground that suits both sides. Here's something especially ridiculous about the new rule: Gary Kubiak wanted to promote a charity event last week. We ran a couple of inches about it in the Chronicle. We wanted to run a video with him talking about it, which would have reached a different audience. I asked the Texans to ask the league if having Kubiak on camera talking about the charity event would count toward the 45 seconds. The Texans said the NFL said yes. That's when I decided to do the spoof of the rule. That was ridiculous. I'll tell you another thing I think is preposterous: I wanted to do a video feature on the three Texans coaches, Richard Smith, Frank Bush and Jethro Franklin, who used to be with the Oilers. I can't because, obviously, it would require more than 45 seconds of them sharing their memories. Unless, of course, it was just good memories. But nobody has asked me about the new rule even though I've done more than 100 of these videos. There should be new guidelines that allow you to have more sound for features, more sound if you're doing a video with a player, coach or executive that's not in direct conflict with what's on the team or league website. For instance, news conferences could be on websites. So could postgame interviews, postpractice interviews with coaches, etc. But if we're doing a video that the team website has no interest in doing, which is just about everything A-M and I do, we should be able to use more than 45 seconds. Anyway, ultimately, I'm hoping will have time to reconsider this, but the problem is, he's a little busy and this isn't among his top priorities. As for what the league can do, well, we won't know unless there are a certain number of violations. I guess right now we'll be on double-secret probation for going 15 seconds too long. Thanks for watching and commenting. By the way, this video will self-destruct at noon Friday because nothing can be shown after 24 hours. And they can't be archived, either. It's kind of like Mission Impossible, huh?"

He's not kidding about it being a self-destructing video. Not just the video, but the whole blog post.
  harrisonhits is offline
Old 06-11-2007, 08:48 AM   #2
kirjtc2
Registered User
 
kirjtc2's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 1,926
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $72295


kirjtc2 is an unknown quantity at this point
The league wants to do this because they can. Since the possibility of fans dropping out over this is unlikely, they'll have everyone eating out of the palm of their hand. Media outlets are unwilling to fight back because they know they'll lose whatever access they have left.

Look at how NESN has essentially put the kibosh on the other local stations airing all but the most basic highlights of Sox games. They want everyone getting their Sox news through them.

Heaven forbid you put 5 seconds from an Oilers-Bengals game from 1986 on YouTube. It's supposed to be in the vaults, never to be seen by anyone again. Why? I don't know.

It's nothing but corporate greed. In the end, the fans lose out. I'll admit - my interest in the NFL and the Patriots has gone down - only a tiny amount, but still down - in the past year or two, since it's been proven they don't give one whit about me as a fan.

Last edited by kirjtc2; 06-11-2007 at 08:52 AM..
  kirjtc2 is offline
Old 06-11-2007, 09:15 AM   #3
Ras
Prolate Spheriod Fan
 
Ras's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Section 111
Posts: 27,001
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $702306
My Mood


Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.
Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.Ras is your brother, your best friend forever.
John McClain is one of the best sportswriters in the country and he takes the lead on this, the NFL doesn't have a chance......
  Ras is offline
Old 06-11-2007, 01:32 PM   #4
freak
Registered User
 
freak's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Durham, NH
Posts: 2,255
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $71750


freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.freak is classy.
Re: OT NFL Censors Houston Chronicle ?

Quote:
As John McClain wrote in the comments before the blog post was pulled:
"Yippee-ki-yay, motherfvcker."
__________________
Go 'Cats, beat Maine!
:Redsox: Believe.....2004.
Another week, another win.
Ummm, yeah......
Wake up the ghosts of the Gahden.
  freak is offline
Old 06-11-2007, 01:47 PM   #5
(P - shoulder)
More Probable Than Not
 
(P - shoulder)'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,905
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $446650
My Mood


(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.
(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.(P - shoulder) taught Chuck Norris everything he knows.
I've been in mourning ever since the Youtube video of Aaron Brooks's famous backwards pass was pulled.
  (P - shoulder) is offline
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Template-Modifications by TMS
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Patriots Planet is not affiliated with the NFL or with the New England Patriots. The views and opinions on this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners and/or operators of this forum and website.