>
Patriots Planet - New England Patriots Forums and Message Boards

Home Members List Top Posters Arcade Casino Toolbar
Go Back   Patriots Planet - New England Patriots Forums and Message Boards > The Razor > Politics and Religion Forum
Mark Forums Read rel="nofollow">Mark Forums Read
Register All Albums FAQDonate Calendar

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-13-2004, 10:52 AM   #1
Nomadic Logic
Registered User
 
Nomadic Logic's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 129
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $51000


Nomadic Logic is an unknown quantity at this point
The Kerry Campaign's Funny Math

http://techcentralstation.com/081304C.html

Quote:
When I was directing the economic team for Senator John McCain in the 2000 presidential election, the most difficult task the team had to perform was a careful score of our candidate's many proposals. The release of our plan was covered by the media at the time as an important test of McCain's candidacy. Would his organization be able to present a detailed analysis of his plans that would withstand the careful scrutiny of the talented and aggressive Bush economic team? The challenge was a difficult one. Normally, big economic bills get scored by the massive Washington scoring institutions such as the CBO or the OMB. With only a tiny fraction of the staff, we had to produce something that survived the acid test.

The stress for all of us was very high. My most vivid memory of the campaign was an elevator ride in New Hampshire that I took with the McCains the night before the plan was released. A very serious Cindy McCain paused on her way to their room, looked me in the eye and said, "Kevin, the numbers better add up." They did, but if they had not, the McCain team was convinced, the media would have had a field day with it.

One of the more curious developments in the presidential campaign is that the media has a strikingly different standard for Democratic and Republican candidates. Senator Kerry litters his stump speeches with countless proposals, but even now, has not provided voters with a careful accounting of how his plan fits together. That job has been left to others.

On the tax side, the Brookings-Urban Joint Tax Policy Center has provided a highly professional analysis of the static budgetary impact of Kerry's proposals. On the spending side, however, no similar study has been done. This omission is crucial, since a key claim by Senator Kerry is that his plan will significantly reduce the deficit. Without a careful analysis of his proposals, that claim cannot be evaluated.

To fill the gap, my AEI colleague Eric Engen and I just completed a detailed analysis of the Kerry spending proposals. To perform the analysis, we combed through Kerry's web site and public statements to assemble a list of every spending promise he has made, and then dug through the public record to find third-party cost estimates for each of his proposals. When necessary, we adjusted the period for the existing score to the 10-year budget window using standard techniques. When we could not find such cost estimates, we relied on numbers that were supplied by the Kerry campaign. When the Kerry campaign did not provide cost estimates, we set the score for that promise to zero.

Even with that generous accounting, the Kerry spending promises add up to an extraordinary amount of money. Our best estimate is that Kerry's proposals will add up to between $2 trillion and $2.1 trillion over the next ten years. Since the revenue from his tax proposals relative to the current baseline is actually negative, this implies that the Kerry proposal would increase the deficit by perhaps as much as $2.5 trillion over the next ten years.

On August 3, 2004, the Kerry campaign responded to criticisms such as this with a revised budget plan. The main difference between the first and second plans is that the campaign now claims to be able to save about $300 billion from eliminating corporate welfare. Even if we include this rather implausible savings in our estimate, the net increase in the deficit associated with Kerry's proposals is on the order of $2.2 trillion.

What would he spend the money on? According to our analysis, roughly half of this additional spending is attributable to Senator Kerry's health care proposals that would add more than $900 billion in federal outlays. Education expenditure accounts for nearly one quarter of Kerry's new spending, with almost $500 billion added over ten years. A $400 billion expansion of military personnel and benefits for veterans comprises most of the remainder of Kerry's spending plans, with the balance distributed among numerous social programs and increases in international aid.

While making all of these promises, Kerry and his surrogates repeatedly have made the claim that they will restore fiscal discipline if elected. They have also promised to adopt a "pay as you go" rule that will guarantee deficit reductions. But they do this at the same time that they promise voters the moon and the stars. It is time for them to state exactly which of Senator Kerry's promises are no longer valid, or stop all of the warm and fuzzy embraces of deficit reduction. They cannot have it both ways. Our just-released paper has highly specific scores for each of his proposals. Perhaps the Kerry team can tell us which ones are incorrect.

That will not happen for two reasons. First, the numbers are correct. Second, the media appear uninterested in the substance of his proposals, or the fact that they are catastrophically inconsistent. Perhaps, now that both the spending and tax sides have been carefully scrutinized by outside economists, the substance will begin to seep into the popular discourse. If it does, Kerry will have some explaining to do.

Kevin Hassett recently wrote "Kerry and Me" for TCS.
Those are some scary numbers, folks. I'm not a fan of President Bush's spending up to this point, but it doesn't look as if Senator Kerry would help the problem at all.
  Nomadic Logic is offline Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 12:12 PM   #2
thomas144
Bandwagon Fan
 
thomas144's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Winchester, MA
Posts: 7,388
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $226250
My Mood


thomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzler
thomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzlerthomas144 really knows how to handle a Twizzler
"the fact that they are catastrophically inconsistent"

I am so sick of this BS. This country deserves another 4 years of Bush.
  thomas144 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2004, 12:37 PM   #3
spiderman
Registered User
 
spiderman's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,107
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $117914
My Mood


spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.spiderman is classy.
I think someone has hi-jacked Thomas144's account. Either that or he woke up this morning and had an epiphany.
  spiderman is offline Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Template-Modifications by TMS
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Patriots Planet is not affiliated with the NFL or with the New England Patriots. The views and opinions on this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners and/or operators of this forum and website.