>
Patriots Planet - New England Patriots Forums and Message Boards

Home Members List Top Posters Arcade Casino Toolbar
Go Back   Patriots Planet - New England Patriots Forums and Message Boards > The Razor > Politics and Religion Forum
Mark Forums Read rel="nofollow">Mark Forums Read
Register All Albums FAQDonate Calendar

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 07-10-2019, 07:16 AM   #31
mooseontheloose
See, moose love the Pats too!
 
mooseontheloose's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Great White North
Posts: 15,069
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $742705
My Mood


mooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a life
mooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a lifemooseontheloose is still looking for a life
Of course there should be a line.

When was the last time you saw a woman (natural or on drugs) begin competing in a men's division and break records? Literally never. Yet average male athletes who are FAR from the top of their sport instantly become GOATs the second they start competing against women.

This isn't some insult against women. It's science. Male frames are bigger and male genetics allow for much greater concentrations of muscle and (therefore) strength. Even after a full transition, if you went through puberty as a male then there's no going back. A transitioned male > female is still going to be significantly "better" at almost any sport versus even a juicing woman of equal skill level. This isn't a debate. There's mountains of evidence emerging right now because this is a one way street. Like I said, women NEVER dominate after switching to male sports.

If you don't draw a line, female sports will die because there won't be any females left competing at the top levels.

The only solution is to base divisions on biological sex rather than gender (which arguably they already do).

The irony is that drawing this line would protect and benefit actual women, which somehow it's bigoted? Right, because regular female athletes aren't allow to run cycles of steroids but they should be expected to compete against "women" who are naturally stronger than the most juiced women? lol

And this extends beyond strength. Years ago Serena Williams was asked if she would ever play a game against Roddick (think it was him) and she rejected it outright, basically saying that she would get destroyed. A while later when she was one of the top women in the world, she played a match against a guy ranked like 250 and got demolished.

Does that mean Serena is shit or deserves less praise? Of course not, because these divisions exist for a reason. She is dominant among her PEERS (other biological women) and she shouldn't be required to be better than men (lol biology) in order to be considered great or the GOAT. But if these lines aren't drawn around sex, that's exactly what she and others like her will have to do moving forward.

Last edited by mooseontheloose; 07-10-2019 at 07:22 AM..
__________________
  mooseontheloose is offline Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Template-Modifications by TMS
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Patriots Planet is not affiliated with the NFL or with the New England Patriots. The views and opinions on this forum do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners and/or operators of this forum and website.