View Single Post
Old 11-08-2019, 06:41 PM   #21
O_P_T
Why Be Normal
 
O_P_T's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 21,316
Posting Frequency


Casino cash: $844875
My Mood


O_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker room
O_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker roomO_P_T has access to the Patriots' locker room
Baron,

I'm shocked, shocked that you completely misunderstood my post and the article I quoted.

It was not an argument claiming all conspiracy theories are invalid nor against any given conspiracy theory.

I posted it simply to show that people are predisposed to "connect the dots" and believe "conspiracies" regardless of the data for or against said conspiracy.

The fact that you tried to support the concept of 'conspiracy theories" by showing that some things that were called that turned out to be true is a classic Fallacy of composition. The fact that any given one was true says absolutely nothing about any other one.

You want to "prove" a conspiracy to me?

Provide me "real" evidence.

By "real" I point to the Russian Arctic expedition you linked to here.

You think they said they found the WWII stuff, et al, on the newly discovered islands, but the article doesn't say that.

You are assuming they meant that, when Occam's Razor says they didn't.

The other material is in a different paragraph and they specifically cite Novaya Zemlya as the location these items were found.

Why would they specifically state Novaya Zemlya if the items were found on as yet unnamed islands?

You are making a connection (i.e., finding a pattern) here, that doesn't really exist.

IMHO, the same can be said for most of your "conspiracy theories".

So bring it on, just be willing to listen when someone points out what they see as the failings of your analysis.
__________________
I AM PATRIOTS

"Some day I want to see them raise up on their piss-soaked hind legs and howl, "Jesus Christ, it's the Goddamned Patriots again and that son-of-a-f*cking-bitch Belichick".
Paraphrasing George S. Patton
  O_P_T is offline Reply With Quote