Mark_Henderson
08-08-2004, 04:19 PM
There seems to be a mix of Bush supporters and detractors here, so I'm curious what people will have to say on this.
I'm of the opinion that GW Bush may represent the ideologically extreme wing of his party more than any President in the last 100 years. From placing timber/oil industry executives in charge of environmental regulatory agencies, to seeking constitutional amendments for social issues, to cutting taxes on the wealthy during a time of deficit spending, Bush consistently takes the right wing stance, though he tries to portray this differently when seeking re-election.
In 1972, the Democrats were arguably out of step by how far left the party shifted with George McGovern. It's comical to look at footage from that convention because the people on the podium look like the cast from "Hair". But, McGovern didn't get elected.
My question is, can you think of any President since World War II who has governed from a more ideologically extreme position?
I'm of the opinion that GW Bush may represent the ideologically extreme wing of his party more than any President in the last 100 years. From placing timber/oil industry executives in charge of environmental regulatory agencies, to seeking constitutional amendments for social issues, to cutting taxes on the wealthy during a time of deficit spending, Bush consistently takes the right wing stance, though he tries to portray this differently when seeking re-election.
In 1972, the Democrats were arguably out of step by how far left the party shifted with George McGovern. It's comical to look at footage from that convention because the people on the podium look like the cast from "Hair". But, McGovern didn't get elected.
My question is, can you think of any President since World War II who has governed from a more ideologically extreme position?