ItsGood_ItsGood
01-31-2003, 11:03 PM
Flashback to last year at this time: The morning after the Super Bowl, one of the first things I did, after making sure I didn't dream the whole thing and take a half a bottle of aspirin, was get on line and bathe myself in the misery of all the Patriots doubters on sports pages across the nation.
First, St. Louis. The sun had barely risen on the Rams' disappointment when the Post-Dispatch was running a reader poll about why the Rams lost. Warner? The prevent defense? Not using Faulk? Nothing about the Patriots out playing them. Nothing. What a joy to wallow in their arrogant misery.
Then it was off to the New York papers, particularly the ones that carried the "Belichicken" headlines. They were calling it one of the great upsets and coaching jobs of all times. I delighted in their crow-eating. Cleveland, the city who embraced Albert Belle, who hate BB more than they hate Saddam, handed him the respect he so clearly earned.
Then, Oakland. Oh the pleasure...Tarry, delight, so seldom met. They suffered, they whined, they complained. They should have won. It was taken away from them. No mention of the 50 or so opportunities they had against the Pats. Or how Brady threw for 300+ yards in a maelstrom against them. No mention of how they blew the home field advantage. Nor of how they would have been annihilated by Pittsburgh or by St. Louis. Wall to wall coverage of how they were done wrong.
So imagine my disappointment this week when I logged onto the Oakland papers this week and found...nothing of the kind. Like the Grinch with his hand to his ear waiting for the Whos to cry boo hoo hoo...I heard the columnists were actually...blaming the Raiders. They even said that the Bucs beat them. I read the columns over again just to make sure, but, yes, this was not the fault of the NFL or the refs or the weather or anyone but the Black and Silver.
Of course, the when the Whos woke to find no Xmas had come, they didn't set fire to vehicles and loot a McDonald's, so I got that going for me.
First, St. Louis. The sun had barely risen on the Rams' disappointment when the Post-Dispatch was running a reader poll about why the Rams lost. Warner? The prevent defense? Not using Faulk? Nothing about the Patriots out playing them. Nothing. What a joy to wallow in their arrogant misery.
Then it was off to the New York papers, particularly the ones that carried the "Belichicken" headlines. They were calling it one of the great upsets and coaching jobs of all times. I delighted in their crow-eating. Cleveland, the city who embraced Albert Belle, who hate BB more than they hate Saddam, handed him the respect he so clearly earned.
Then, Oakland. Oh the pleasure...Tarry, delight, so seldom met. They suffered, they whined, they complained. They should have won. It was taken away from them. No mention of the 50 or so opportunities they had against the Pats. Or how Brady threw for 300+ yards in a maelstrom against them. No mention of how they blew the home field advantage. Nor of how they would have been annihilated by Pittsburgh or by St. Louis. Wall to wall coverage of how they were done wrong.
So imagine my disappointment this week when I logged onto the Oakland papers this week and found...nothing of the kind. Like the Grinch with his hand to his ear waiting for the Whos to cry boo hoo hoo...I heard the columnists were actually...blaming the Raiders. They even said that the Bucs beat them. I read the columns over again just to make sure, but, yes, this was not the fault of the NFL or the refs or the weather or anyone but the Black and Silver.
Of course, the when the Whos woke to find no Xmas had come, they didn't set fire to vehicles and loot a McDonald's, so I got that going for me.